std::unique_lock or std::lock_guard C++11 区别

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20516773/stdunique-lockstdmutex-or-stdlock-guardstdmutex

 

The difference is that you can lock and unlock a std::unique_lockstd::lock_guard will be locked only once on construction and unlocked on destruction.

So for usecase B you definitely need a std::unique_lock for the condition variable. In case A it depends whether you need to relock the guard.

std::unique_lock has other features that allow it to e.g.: be constructed without locking the mutex immediately but to build the RAII wrapper (see here).

Lock guards can be used when you simply need a wrapper for a limited scope, e.g.: a member function:

void member_foo() {
    std::lock_guard<mutex_type> lock(this->my_mutex);
    ...
}

To clarify a question by chmike, by default std::lock_guard and std::unique_lock are the same. So in the above case, you could replace std::lock_guard with std::unique_lock. However, std::unique_lock might have a tad more overhead.

原文链接: https://www.cnblogs.com/diegodu/p/6243939.html

欢迎关注

微信关注下方公众号,第一时间获取干货硬货;公众号内回复【pdf】免费获取数百本计算机经典书籍

    std::unique_lock<std::mutex> or std::lock_guard<std::mutex> C++11 区别

原创文章受到原创版权保护。转载请注明出处:https://www.ccppcoding.com/archives/246950

非原创文章文中已经注明原地址,如有侵权,联系删除

关注公众号【高性能架构探索】,第一时间获取最新文章

转载文章受原作者版权保护。转载请注明原作者出处!

(0)
上一篇 2023年2月14日 上午1:54
下一篇 2023年2月14日 上午1:54

相关推荐